You wanted customized…

You got customized. If you go into the Advanced tab of the Better BibTeX preferences you will find a text box (empty by default) where you can edit a javascript snippet which will be executed for each reference generated in the Bib(La)TeX exporter. In this code, you have access to the reference just before it will be written out and cached. There is an API to do this, and it’s fairly stable, but usually you can just open a new issue and ask me to write it, and I’ll add it here (it’s how the examples got here). Postscripts are available in 4 of the translators:

  1. BetterBibLaTeX
  2. BetterBibTeX
  3. BetterCSLJSON
  4. BetterCSLYAML

You can (and totally should) check in which translator your postscript is running, which you can do by testing for Translator.<id> where <id> is one of these four names, using something like

if (Translator.BetterBibLaTeX) {

or alternately on the full name using a switch

switch (Translator.header.label) {
  case 'Better BibLaTeX':
  case 'Better BibTeX':
  case 'Better CSL JSON':
  case 'Better CSL YAML':

If you want to run a postscript in the CSL translators but don’t care whether it will output YAML or JSON, you can test for Translator.BetterCSL, which will be true when either one of BetterCSLJSON or BetterCSLYAML is active.

In the BetterBib(La)TeX context you will typically access this, which will be undefined in the BetterCSL(JSON|YAML) context. In the BetterBib(La)TeX context, your Bib(La)TeX reference being built is available as both this and reference; the source Zotero item is available both as item (and this.item for historic reasons). In the BetterCSL(JSON|YAML) context, the CSL object being built is available as reference and the the source Zotero item is available as item.

You should really test for the translator context in your postscripts. If you don’t because you have a postscript that pre-date CSL support, you will probably be using this.<something> in your existing postscripts, which will make the script will non-fatally error out. So you’re very probably good to go as-is. But please fix your postscripts to test for the translator context.

The API (for the Better Bib(La)TeX context)

The postscript should be a javascript snippet. You can access the data with following objects or functions.

In BetterBibLaTeX and BetterBibTeX,

  • this is the BibTeX reference you are building, and the reference has a number of fields.
  • this.fields
  • item (or as mentioned earlier, this.item) is the Zotero item that’s the source of the reference.

    e.g. access the date in zotero item

  • this.has is a dictionary of fields for output.

    e.g. access the year in output this.has.year

  • this.add is the function to add or modify keys in this.has. It will check check for unintentional duplicates (unless you specify explicitly with replace: true).

    e.g. change the value of year in output this.add({name: 'year', replace: true, value: your_year_value})

In BetterCSLJSON and BetterCSLYAML:

  • reference is the CSL object being built. Any changes made to this object will directly change the CSL object being output.
  • item is the Zotero reference it’s being built from.

Add accessdate, url for BibTeX

Since BibTeX doesn’t really have well-defined behavior across styles the way BibLaTeX does, BBT can’t generate URL data which is compatible with all BibTeX styles. If you know the style you use yourself, you can add the data in the format you want using a postscript. The script below will add a note for the last accessed date, and a \url tag within the howpublished field, but only for BibTeX, not for BibLaTeX, and only for webpage entries:

if (Translator.BetterBibTeX && item.itemType === 'webpage') {
    if (item.accessDate) {
      this.add({ name: 'note', value: "(accessed " + item.accessDate + ")" });
    if (item.url) {
      this.add({ name: 'howpublished', bibtex: "{\\url{" + this.enc_verbatim({value: item.url}) + "}}" });

Comma’s in keywords

If you want to retain commas in your keywords (e.g. for chemical elements) and separate with a comma-space, you could do:

if (Translator.BetterBibTeX || Translator.BetterBibLaTeX) {
  this.add({ name: 'keywords', replace: true, value: item.tags, sep: ', ' });

as the default encoder knows what to do with arrays, if you give it a separator.

Add DOI in note field

if ((Translator.BetterBibTeX || Translator.BetterBibLaTeX) && item.DOI) {
  var doi = item.DOI;
  if (doi.indexOf('doi:') != 0) { doi = 'doi:' + doi; }
  this.add({ name: 'note', duplicate: true, value: '[' + doi + ']' });

Add arXiv data

arXiv is a bit of an odd duck. It really isn’t a journal, so it shouldn’t be the journal title, and their own recommendations on how to include arXiv IDs is a little lacking: this doesn’t say where to include the arXiv:... identfier, and this says not to include it. Nor does it give any recommendations on how to achieve the desired output.

But for arguments’ sake, let’s say you get the desired output by including an empty journaltitle field (ugh) and stuff the arXiv:... ID in the pages field (ugh). You could do that with the following postscript:

if ((Translator.BetterBibTeX || Translator.BetterBibLaTeX) && {
  this.add({ name: 'pages', value: });
  if (!this.has.journaltitle) { this.add({ name: 'journaltitle', bibtex: '{}' }); }

Detect and protect LaTeX math formulas

if (Translator.BetterBibTeX && this.has.title) {
  this.add({ name: 'title', value: item.title.replace(/(\$.*?\$)/g, '<pre>$1</pre>'), replace: true });

Replace director with author for videoRecording and film references

if (Translator.BetterBibLaTeX) {
  switch (item.itemType) {
    case 'videoRecording':
    case 'film':
      item.creators.forEach(creator => {
        if (creator.creatorType === 'director') creator.creatorType = 'author'

This site is open source. Improve this page